Tuesday, October 27, 2009

No Cut Ears




Normal

Basic common sense, the ears and tail of a dog are there for a reason.

Like: Dogs communicate with each other with their ears & tails. Dogs need their ears & tails. Do not hack off your puppy's body parts. How would you like it if you couldn't speak to other people?

Besides that, we people rely on being able to read a dog's body language.

I knew one person who liked bobbed tail dogs so she could see their "target" as she called it. It took me a moment to figure out what she meant. She made hand motions. I understood.

Not my thing. I like a dog to have a normal tail and for the dog to be able to cover up that part with his tail.

I knew a guy who raised dogs whose tails went over their backs. He asked me if I liked the way his dogs looked. I said: Yes, but I'd like them better if they carried their tails normally, so their @$$?0// wasn't so obvious.

He said that was his favorite part of the dog, he thought it was cute, and he liked to look at it.

Ever since then, I wonder about the people who post that they just can't stand the idea that cruelty laws might prevent them from lopping off their dogs tails.

What's so great about having a dog with no tail?

It's not because you like looking at the dog's uncovered @$$?)// is it?

Sometimes you just have to laugh at people.
Permission to cross post.